الاثنين، 3 أبريل 2017

Beautiful geological destinations

                         Silfra

Silfra fissure.
The Mid-Atlantic Ridge passing through Þingvellir
Silfra is a rift formed in the divergent tectonic boundary between the North American and Eurasian plates and is located in the Þingvallavatn Lake in the Þingvellir National Park in Iceland.

FormationEdit

Silfra lies in the Þingvellir valley and within the Þingvellir National Park. The valley, and Silfra itself, were formed by the divergent tectonic drift of the Eurasian and North American plates. The plates drift about 2 cm farther apart every year, building up tension between the plates and the earth mass above. This tension is relieved through periodic major earthquakes at approximately ten year intervals, which have caused cracks and fissures to form in Þingvellir valley; Silfra lies at the rim of the Þingvallavatn Lake [1] and is one of the largest and deepest of these fissures. The Silfra fissure intercepts a major aquifer, which feeds multiple springs at its base.[2] Boulders and rocks falling into the widening cracks have formed caves within the fissures.[1][3]

HydrologyEdit

Silfra is spring fed by groundwater originating as meltwater from Langjökull, Iceland's second largest glacier, about fifty kilometres north of the Þingvallavatn Lake. In the distant past, this Langjökull meltwater ran through a river directly and unimpeded into the Þingvallavatn Lake. This river was blocked a few thousand years ago by lava flows from the Skjaldbreiður volcano causing the meltwater to pond and seep underground into the porous lava rock to form an aquifer. This water then percolates through the aquifer for thirty to a hundred years before emerging from the fissure springs in the Þingvallavatn Lake fifty kilometres to the south. The emerging, highly filtered groundwater is exceptionally clear and potable.[2][4][5]

Scuba divingEdit

The diver's right hand is on the North American Plate and the left hand on the Eurasian Plate
Scuba divers and snorkelers are attracted to Sifra's exceptionally clear, fresh, water, its geological significance and the rare opportunity to swim between continental plates.[6][7][8] The rift offers exceptional visibility of 70–80 metres.[citation needed]. The site has been placed on the world's top fifty diving destinations by at least one travel site.[9]
There are three main dive sites: Silfra Hall, Silfra Cathedral and Silfra Lagoon. The most spectacular section is the Cathedral, which is a 100 metres long fissure with visibility almost from end to end.[10] Shallow at the entry points at the ends of the fissure, Silfra descends to a maximum depth of 63 metres but diving to this depth is seldom done as it requires technical diving skills. The water temperature is between 2–4 °C (36–39 °F) but can be comfortably dived using a dry suit.

السبت، 1 أبريل 2017

?Who should buy a Mac

It's a very good question. Many people are fighting over PC vs Mac from ages. But this question...is beautiful!
Thanks for A2A! Aniket Angadi
[I am going to use lots of AND and brackets…you see that? also some typo :p]
So who should buy a Mac?
Simple Answer: Pretty much anyone who needs a computer other than a gaming machine.
AND Following are few kind of people who should NOT buy a Mac as the primary computing device:
  • Gamers : Mac is NOT for latest games.
  • And (of course) Developers of other platforms (OS)
  • And people who like to upgrade hardware as per the latest requirements
  • And people on a budget: I am sure many haters want a Mac but it is expensive.
  • <list is little long>
Before I write the reasons, let’s be on the same page:
  1. I have PCs with Windows & Linux
  2. I have a Macbook Pro (iPhone & iPad)
  3. I am NOT an Apple fanboy!
In fact, most sane IT people I know doesn't hate Apple or Windows. However, we do get frustrated with some features/limitations in each of them.
The Internet is full of people who claim Mac is an inferior product because these days Apple rarely matches up with industries latest updates ( they have a good reason for it, but that's another topic.) And most of these people do NOT have a Mac
And because it's the Internet, we have many (way many) people claiming Mac is better because it's a Mac (I doubt if any of these people knows the difference of SSD/HDD or even can code or understands computing)
It's a myth that the only designer or photographers uses Mac. One must see a DEFCON. Programmers are hell lot of creative people!
So anyone who understands and value the followings seems to be the person who incline towards a Mac. Hence, should buy a Mac.
Few points that are in my mind at this moment:
  1. Design: Each element is designed from customer's perspective. And of course, Mac doesn't look like a plastic box because it's not. Plus, the design of internal components is also impressive. Such as how to keep machine ‘cool’ and if required keep it as silent as possible
Fig 1: It’s beautiful for a reason
Fig 2: Mac also makes noise but its low
2. Cost effective in terms of stability and compatibility.
In years past, PCs were known to crash, and users would get the “blue screen,” but Microsoft has made their operating systems more reliable in recent years. On the other hand, Mac hardware and software have tended to be stable, and crashes occur infrequently.
Unlike with a PC, a Mac can also run Windows. If you want to have a combination Mac and PC, a Mac is your best option.
3. Light weight & small in size: Hence, easy to carry. And have a decent battery life
Fig 3: iTunes movie playback
Fig 4: Peacekeeper web use
4. Powerful (kind of): Mac laptops perform well due to marriage between hardware and software. Apple is one of the pioneers in making such marvels. And of course, they charge for such arrangements. (PC certainly can beat Mac on many industry tests, however, when a simple element is infused it changes the game. That element is user experience. I know user experience is an emotion thing and it's not tangible. But sale speaks its language. It's Mac vs rest of the PCs, still, makes a dent in the universe)
5. It’s little more secure even without an anti-virus.
Why I use a Mac personally?
Apart from all above points:
1. Video Editing: Final Cut Pro performance is stunning (I switched from Adobe Premium pro)
2. Still Editing: Retina screen makes a big difference in photo editing. I don't need big monitors and calibrate them.
3. Ease of use: You will be surprised how applications are well integrated and one can get used to it.
4. The power of Unix/Linux: Yes, MacOS (and older versions) are based on Unix. I am a homebrew [1]fan/user
5. I can code: All web based technology, Android, iOS, MacOS even C# (but seriously I switch to windows when programming for Windows platform, it's known)
Fig 5: Mac and PC interesting stuff
There are many people who understand and respect all above points (or more) but do not value it, in terms of money or freedom or any other valid elements. None of them are wrong or right. We all have different views and values.
I hope I did answer your question. If you still have doubts (It's a good thing) go to an Apple store, use a Mac- experience the difference. Ask more questions!
If I did help a bit, please Upvote!
Thank you for reading :)
Sources:
5. My biological neural network (aka my brain)

The Internet Isn’t the Wild Wild West Anymore. It’s Westworld.

A shameless vote by Congress gives a green light to big companies exploiting consumers online

(Courtesy of HBO)
Hi, Backchannelers. Steven here. For many years, when people described how the internet worked — whether they were talking about shopping, communicating, or starting a business there — they inevitably invoked a single metaphor. The internet, said just about everybody, was a contemporary incarnation of the wild, wild West.
This implied two things. First, the thrilling feeling of possibilities — anything goes, and that means even the most febrile imagination can not envision the opportunities in this virgin turf. The second was a scarier feeling that comes from the lawlessness of a territory too new for rules to be drawn. Anything goes, and that means you have to watch carefully for ripoffs and scams.
Over twenty years into the consumer internet revolution, and we’re now wise to many scams. And like any well-explored frontier, many of the stakes have been claimed, and are now lushly developed. Through a mix of market forces and regulation, we’ve brought civilization to the electronic provinces. There are still risks — watch out for cyber-thieves holding your data hostage through virus incursions! — but we’ve all accepted that the net is a reasonable place to do business, communicate with each other, and even to access crucial services, like heath care.
These days, the biggest threats on the internet seem to come not from small-time rogues, but big-time corporations that have embraced the internet technology, and often a favored position in the marketplace, to lock in and limit what people might do. The Obama administration tried to address this power imbalance, by attempting to level the suddenly tilted playing field. That’s why we got net neutrality, which preserves equal access to the open net for small teams of small means.
This same argument is also behind the logic of a last year’s Obama-era regulation to stop Internet Service Providers from selling user data to the highest bidder, without permission. It made perfect sense — after all, landline phone carriers can’t sell information about your calls. Most of the population has few or no choices to make in choosing an ISP. Yet, ISPs take note of every site you visit, your location, how long you are on the site, who you send email to…just about every aspect of your life. So it makes perfect sense for consumers to expect their private information to remain private, unless they knowingly allow the Comcasts and AT&Ts of the world to sell it off. It’s not surprising that only the big online bullies (and their paid flunkies) raised objections to the Obama regulation to protect this privacy.
Yet last week both the Senate and the House — overwhelmingly with Republican votes — voted to overturn those limits, and to ban the FCC from ever imposing them again. President Trump is expected to sign the legislation, permanently making the internet a place for rapacious data collecting from largely unwitting consumers. (Here’s a list of those who voted against your privacy; bookmark it for 2018!)
Those supporting this awful rollback say it’s about fair play (after all, services like Google and Facebook weren’t subject to the rule) and freedom. But no one is forced to use Google or Facebook, and those companies make their money from advertising. The ISPs often are monopolies in their region — and consumers pay them. Anyway, if Congress wants Google and Verizon to play by the same privacy rules, why not make it so no company can sell private information without permission?
And the freedom the GOP talks about is largely the consumer’s freedom to get fleeced by big corporations.
No, the internet is not so much the wild, wild West anymore. Increasingly, it’s more like Westworld.
And we’re the androids.
Last week, Pam Edstrom died. She was the early spokesperson for a new company called Microsoft, leaving the company in 1984 to co-found the PR company Waggoner-Edstrom, whose key client for many years (indeed, to this day) was that same Microsoft. Pam was instrumental in shaping, for better or worse, a lot of the conventions that are now standard in tech PR. For instance, pre-Wagg-Ed, as it was commonly called, reporters generally spoke to tech execs with no PR folks in the room. Now, even startups (when they can get away with it) follow the Wagg-Ed model of having detailed strategic publicity plans, implemented by hand-picking the right reporters.
I won’t remember Pam for those client-friendly innovations, but for her honesty and her passion — for both her clients and for her belief that tech would be a huge and beneficial benefit for society. Though not averse to spin, the truth mattered to her. If a critical story was fair, she’d defend the reporter, even if Bill Gates himself was furious. (Believe me, I know.)
In the midst of a tense reporter-company standoff, you could crack a joke with Pam. I’m sorry that there will be no more laughs.

This week on Backchannel:

Why Bargain Travel Sites May No Longer Be Bargains: Aggregators like TripAdvisor and Expedia used to offer the lowest prices around. But that’s starting to change, as hotels and airlines attempt to take back the booking power. Doug Garr digs into the knotty world of online travel brokers, and explains why you might be better off booking directly through a hotel’s front desk.
Handcuffing Cities to Telecom Giants: Right now, there are efforts underway in at least 17 states and at the FCC that would essentially privatize public rights of way, all in the name of 5G. One problem with that? 5G doesn’t exist yet. Susan Crawford explains why we should be very skeptical of anything done in its name.
Obama’s Secretary of Defense Won’t Stop Trying to Fix the World: In Washington, D.C., Ash Carter built bridges between Silicon Valley and the Pentagon. With his new gigs in Boston, he hopes to strengthen them. Our Jessi Hempel caught up with Carter to discuss his next steps, and what they mean for Silicon Valley.

Like this newsletter?

We’ve got another one coming. In the next couple of weeks, Backchannel will debut a second newsletter, featuring a “person of interest” and seeded with links not just to our stories, but hidden gems elsewhere that you won’t want to miss. But you have to sign up to get it, even if you currently receive the one you’re reading now. All you have to do is sign up at the link below, and you’ll get the new one as soon as it ships.